Browse All Tribes or choose a Tribe below:
By signing up I agree to Property Tribes Terms and Conditions
Already a PT member? Log In
Sign Up With Facebook, Twitter, or Google
By signing up, I agree to Property Tribes Terms and Conditions
Already a PT member? Log In
Don't have an account? Sign Up
To reset your password just enter the email address you registered with and we'll send you a link to access a new password.
Landlords face an eye-watering effective tax rate of 66 per cent on rental profits when mortgage interest relief changes come into full effect, figures calculated for This is Money and MailOnline Property reveal.
The numbers highlight why the tax clampdown on buy-to-let has left many landlords questioning whether their property investments are still worth it given the extra financial costs they now face.
Realising that they are paying such a high effective tax rate may push yet more landlords to quit buy-to-let and push rental prices even further amid a shortage of properties, it is feared.Full/source articleThis coincides with this story:Dozens of people evicted from their apartments in Kent will be given two weeks to find new homes or could be forced to move to County Durham.
People living in Hythe’s Pensland House and Marlborough Court face homelessness after property owner Chelsea Portfolio gave them their marching orders to develop the building.
A number of benefit claimants living in the 56 affordable beach-side apartments say Folkestone and Hythe District Council (FHDC) offered new properties 330 miles in north England.The council have over 1,000 households awaiting social housing in the area.
“There is no prospect of immediate or even mid-term social housing for those approaching,” wrote council housing manager Mark Damiral.
He added people would be given two weeks to seek private housing or be referred for “a choice of property in Durham or the surrounding area.”
Full/source articleThis is all panning out as predicted here: What causes homelessness in the UK? S24 chickens coming home to roost?!SEE ALSO - Rental stock declines - 1st time in 18 yearsUP NEXT - BTL property purchases in sharp declineDON'T MISS - 9 reasons why Section 24 will be reversedNOW WATCH:
Vanessa Warwick Landlord and Co-Founder of PropertyTribes.com **If you have got value from Property Tribes, find out how you can support it in remaining a free to use community resource**
Will leave it to the more experienced landlords to check me on this but to my eyes, the net yield on the property they have used to calculate this is laughable and wouldn't make it past the first tab on my stacking sheet.Every time I read these stories I revisit the Telegraph's BTL tax calc and enter my figures for peace of mind and I always come out as paying less tax when the new rules come in rather than more but I am just starting out.I'm sure DL will hammer me on this but does anyone think that Buffett's old adage about being greedy when others are fearful might be relevant in the current environment and near-term? If you can make the figures work, the demand is certainly going to be there.
I don’t understand how you could be paying less tax with the new rules - pay the same if you are a 20% tax payer and stay a 20% tax payer.
As long as you are not a graduate repaying the student loan, otherwise you can add a further 9% taking the marginal tax rate to 75%. If you also happen to be a parent and are losing the child benefit, the marginal tax rate must be getting towards 85% dependent upon how many children you have.
Still, it's better than it was under Labour in the '70s when the marginal rate of tax for high earners was, I believe, circa 98%,
Good to highlight the true cost of the tax regime changes. I think that the government would've known all this all along. They may also rely on many landlords who are running around looking after their tenants and families etc doing these sums (at best) only annually after the event. So not "waking up" till 2019 or later.
Once the LLs realise the impact, they will surely de-gear if at all possible (cheaper than moving into holiday lets etc). If not they'll move to sell.
De-gearing is something I, DL and a number of others on here have been advocating for a long time now. It's the logical adaptation of a business model which is necessary for all businesses in the light of changing circumstances. It hopefully will make folk realise that this IS a business(a long term one) not a bit of fun when property prices happen to be on the up.
There have been a number of studies over the years which show that income tax take actually falls once you charge over 50%. So the proof again will be in the sales of BTL properties, the start of which we are already seeing in the auction catalogues and land registry statistics.
Question is, who, under the PRA directives, will be in a position to buy them. If there are a few cash purchasers out there, it may be them but they will want their "pound of flesh" in a price adjustment. Distress makes for an uneven bargain.
Anyway, glad someone has shown the true cost via simple maths. Thank you.
Thank you for this post on a very interesting topic.
As a current 20% tax rate payer, who doesn’t expect a rise taking me into the 40% bracket, am I right to assume that I will continue to pay the same amount of tax?
If your salary + rental profit (without mortgage interest deducted) take you into the 40% bracket then you'll pay more. See the government S24 examples website:
(This is not advice, just how I understand the rules)
That's how I read it too- thank you
Although in my case it's a small pension that I finally get with my BTL gross that tips me into hight rate.
It means that 4k of my pension is gone before i'm actually taxed on it!!
I get a pension as well as a salary and rental income. I don't need the pension yet so I just add it to the total amount that goes into my pension through salary sacrifice. I was originally advised by a financial advisor to pay it into a new pension scheme but adding it into my works one is better.