Browse All Tribes or choose a Tribe below:
By signing up I agree to Property Tribes Terms and Conditions
Already a PT member? Log In
Sign Up With Facebook, Twitter, or Google
By signing up, I agree to Property Tribes Terms and Conditions
Already a PT member? Log In
Don't have an account? Sign Up
To reset your password just enter the email address you registered with and we'll send you a link to access a new password.
You will have to ask MS why he invested and the return he wanted. What he told me was that he liked what PT stood for.
With ref to the threads/companies that have scrutiny: You will have to ask the people that started them not me - more importantly you exaggerate the use of the term exaggerate.
Tribal behaviour is relative to the viewer, you will see it how you wish to see it and translate it as such. Over to you.
I see it differently.
One thing that we have on this thread that is common is the lack of evidence when making accusations!!!
You say that no advertisers get challenged/scrutinised:
Here's three -
It seems you missed them with your DD work on this thread/topic. I assume you did some?
So what we have here is exaggerated commentary from you that lacks evidence or any form of substantiation and what we have from me is answers that prove that no one can buy immunity.
general operations director, site owner and moderator - propertytribes.com
Thanks for that Matt.
Aggression, hhmm I think it is clear who the aggressor is.
The examples are a snap shot, but they back up the point. For clarity that point is that no one is immune from DD work which you have allowed to be stated. Thank you.
As stated before I have all the evidence that I need to allow the commentary that you refer to - and as evidenced above I think it's very clear those that have it - or not - as the case maybe.
If there is no commentary on PT about MS for people to do DD work on then shame on you for not putting any there - unless of course like all of us you weren't aware there was a problem!?
PT is not linked to people losing money to MS like you are not linked to them losing money - I assume you are not linked.
It is utter rot that people are protected from PT by being linked to PT. It is abundantly clear and evidenced that this is not the case.
But you will see what you want and subvert as you will. But I thank you for allowing me to be clear.
You don't need a flurry of words, it's OK.
I'm not sure how many times I have to say this, but I'll try again:
Any contentious thread that is started on PT has been evidenced. I'll say that again - Any contentious thread that is started on PT has been evidenced.
Please don't make me have to say it again.
PT is a platform that allows conversation that is substantiated.
Selling large scale investments does not hang on being associated with a forum, it hangs on financial modelling.
Learning has already happened from this thread.
There are those with evidence and there are those without.
But again thank you for allowing me to bring clarity.
(*moderator note: content removed as the contributor has broken the T's and C's and become abusive*).
Property Week are reporting that an insider has informed them that the administrators believe that they may be able to save Inspired by trading through the difficulties and restructuring the company. I imagine it could take a long time to get the company back on track, but at least there is hope that it may be saved.I am subscribed to Property Week and numerous other publications (including Property Investor News and YPN magazine), various forums, and facebook groups, and to the best of my recollection, none of them ever mentioned or gave any hint of any problems developing at Inspired.