Browse All Tribes or choose a Tribe below:
By signing up I agree to Property Tribes Terms and Conditions
Already a PT member? Log In
Sign Up With Facebook, Twitter, or Google
By signing up, I agree to Property Tribes Terms and Conditions
Already a PT member? Log In
Don't have an account? Sign Up
To reset your password just enter the email address you registered with and we'll send you a link to access a new password.
Just a heads up guys that it seems Lewis Hall and Jason Cunningham are linked.
After 4 months of false promise after false promise and now, no contact from Lewis Hall with countless unanswered messages and calls we are still waiting on a full refund of our Sourcing fee of £6,000.00 plus VAT (£7,200.00) and the Landlord holding fee of £500 totalling the sum of £7,700.00. This fee was for a deal that never materialised following Lewis Hall telling us that the landlord wasn't responding and the best option was to refund us.
When the deal was first advertised, it was Lewis Hall and his company Unique Property Sourcing Limited (11555521). I was lead to believe that we were dealing solely with him. Jason Cunningham was never mentioned until after Lewis Hall had agreed to pay us our refund back!After the refund failed to materialise, Lewis Hall then said he needed to wait for his partner, Jason Cunningham, to return. He said Jason, “deals with all the bank stuff”. This is the first time we had heard of Jason Cunningham who then told us that we were the ones who had pulled out of the deal and we would be refunded once the deal was sold to another investor.
Our due diligence was carried out on Lewis Hall at Unique Property Sourcing Limited, not Jason Cunningham and Source Investments due to Jason not being named as a director of the company or having any involvement with the deal.
We have since been understanding in waiting for Jason to sell the deal in order to pay us our refund which has obviously never materialised and we have had excuse after excuse.
We have reason to believe that the landlord does not deal with Jason or Lewis and the deal is no longer theirs to sell despite us being told it is.
As of writing this, we are still awaiting a full refund of £7,700 including VAT.Sewell Properties(*Moderator note: This is a follow on from this thread >>> Jason Cunningham-Source Investments/Quay Acco *0.
It was Jason Cunningham that was expelled from PRS (Property Redress Scheme)
He isn't allowed to source properties if he is no longer a member of the PRS. Why was he expelled?
I understand he was expelled as he wouldn't refund a client when ordered by the PRS to do so.
From reading a previous thread RE Jason Cunningham is seems he was ordered by the PRS to repay a client where a source never materialised. JC then refused to issue the refund.
JC then expelled from PRS.
This seems to be what has happened to us.
It was agreed by Lewis that we would receive a refund within the week as it was not our fault the deal didn't materialise but then the refund still hasn't been actioned.
It seems Jason Cunningham continues to threaten anyone who wishes to speak up, he obviously refuses to learn by his mistakes. Here are the facts about this individual.
1, The definition in the dictionary of a crook is and I quote "a person who is dishonest or a criminal". Jason Cunningham has been been in prison for fraud, which therefore makes him a criminal, therefore it is a fact that he is a crook. He cannot sue anyone who calls him as such as this is factual.
2, Jason Cunningham is banned from being a company director of a Limited Company. Only individuals who make very serious offences would you given such a ban. If there was any warning sign of someone not to do business with, this is it.
3, Jason Cunningham threats of legal action have so far amounted to nothing. Till now at least he has not been represented by any lawyer but handled his claims personally. To date he has not won a single case, to the best of my knowledge, all or most of his cases have been thrown out by the courts. He has been ordered to pay legal fees on at least one case.
4, The law states that to defame someone, they must have prior to the offence had a good reputation. Based on his history, how likely is it that a judge would say his reputation has been tarnished. The facts are, there are countless individuals (including OAP's) who he has tricked and conned and refuses to do the right thing.
5, He is banned from PRS for ignoring their ruling on a case where his conned someone. They ruled against him but he refused to accept this. He therefore cannot legally conduct property business so has set up alias names.