Browse All Tribes or choose a Tribe below:
By signing up I agree to Property Tribes Terms and Conditions
Already a PT member? Log In
Sign Up With Facebook, Twitter, or Google
By signing up, I agree to Property Tribes Terms and Conditions
Already a PT member? Log In
Don't have an account? Sign Up
To reset your password just enter the email address you registered with and we'll send you a link to access a new password.
I have previously split properties into Flats (as I am sure many others have). I understand that some people have the strategy of splitting the titles and some do not.
Can I ask what others have done and why?
Thanks for getting back to me. I have so far chosen to remain on one title (appart from one wich was sold).
However I have understood that some people split the title to refinance, just wondered who has done this and to what advantage.
The way i've done it is to target properties on one freehold, then split the lease, then refinance the units individually.
When buying in its cash or bridge, then refurb and split, then refinance on commercial facility. As Richard G says, if you don't need to its as well to keep it on one title.
But for me, it allows me to get off the bridging finance completely (without waiting 6 months on expensive rates), and pull back my deposit and refurb budget (normally borrowed from an investor). I get it all out because i (a) buy cheap (b) add value through the splitting and © add value through refurb.
The second reason is then the individual units are easier to sell on to investors, using BTL finance, as its harder to get finance for a converted property on one title.
I target properties that have historic use as flats, so i just need to 'regularise' if at all, not old houses with me needing to get planning permission. The reason being, the exit to investors, if i am converting then they are classed as newbuild and the finance is restricted or lower LTVs and more scrutiny. Think thats changing now though.
Having read all that it sounds like i'm doing loads of these, truth is i've only done a few but its something i am concentrating on at the moment.
Lisa All comments are for education and information purposes only and do not construe as advice or a financial promotion. No liability is accepted for comments made. If you wish to receive information in an advisory capacity then please contact me about becoming a client. www.keys-mortgages.com
Lisa, I'm a bit confused.com Are you saying that even if you bought with cash then split the title you would need to wait 6 months to get the properties onto mortgages? Maybe I've misunderstood but that seems to conflict with Arlo's strategy and my one-time experience of splitting the title immediately on purchase.
I'm a bit confused.com
Are you saying that even if you bought with cash then split the title you would need to wait 6 months to get the properties onto mortgages? Maybe I've misunderstood but that seems to conflict with Arlo's strategy and my one-time experience of splitting the title immediately on purchase.
each lender has different criteria and it changes too so it’s important to check. But I can say with certainty that most buy to let lenders I have spoken to with new flat conversions will insist upon the lease having been registered for 6 months.
For example I did one with BM last year where client purchased a house converted to two flats that had leases put in place at time of purchase and they were fine but with another client they insisted upon 6 months!